Threads and Processes in Linux

What is a process? (courtesy of Linux Gazette)

Quoting from Robert Love’s book Linux Kernel Development, “The Process is one of the fundamental abstractions in Unix Operating Systems, the other fundamental abstraction being files.” A process is a program in execution. It consists of the executing program code, a set of resources such as open files, internal kernel data, an address space, one or more threads of execution and a data section containing global variables.

Process Descriptors

Each process has process descriptors associated with it. These hold the information used to keep track of a process in memory. Among the various pieces of information stored about a process are its PID, state, parent process, children, siblings, processor registers, list of open files and address space information.

What is a Thread? (courtesy of Linux Journal)

Threads run within the same address space as the parent process, and therefore require much less time in creation.

What’s the difference between process and thread under Linux? And, more importantly, what is the difference from a scheduler point of view? In short—nothing.

The only worthwhile commonality between a thread and a process is that threads share the same address space completely. All the threads run in the same address space, so a context switch is basically just a jump from one code location to another.

Understanding the Linux Kernel (courtesy of O’Reilly)

Like any time-sharing system, Linux achieves the magical effect of an apparent simultaneous execution of multiple processes by switching from one process to another in a very short time frame. Process switch itself was discussed in Chapter 3, Processes; this chapter deals with scheduling, which is concerned with when to switch and which process to choose.

The chapter consists of three parts. The section “Scheduling Policy” introduces the choices made by Linux to schedule processes in the abstract. The section “The Scheduling Algorithm” discusses the data structures used to implement scheduling and the corresponding algorithm. Finally, the section “System Calls Related to Scheduling” describes the system calls that affect process scheduling.

Scheduling Policy

The scheduling algorithm of traditional Unix operating systems must fulfill several conflicting objectives: fast process response time, good throughput for background jobs, avoidance of process starvation, reconciliation of the needs of low- and high-priority processes, and so on. The set of rules used to determine when and how selecting a new process to run is called scheduling policy.

Linux scheduling is based on the time-sharing technique already introduced in the section “CPU’s Time Sharing” in Chapter 5, Timing Measurements: several processes are allowed to run “concurrently,” which means that the CPU time is roughly divided into “slices,” one for each runnable process. Of course, a single processor can run only one process at any given instant. If a currently running process is not terminated when its time slice or quantum expires, a process switch may take place. Time-sharing relies on timer interrupts and is thus transparent to processes. No additional code needs to be inserted in the programs in order to ensure CPU time-sharing.

The scheduling policy is also based on ranking processes according to their priority. Complicated algorithms are sometimes used to derive the current priority of a process, but the end result is the same: each process is associated with a value that denotes how appropriate it is to be assigned to the CPU.

In Linux, process priority is dynamic. The scheduler keeps track of what processes are doing and adjusts their priorities periodically; in this way, processes that have been denied the use of the CPU for a long time interval are boosted by dynamically increasing their priority. Correspondingly, processes running for a long time are penalized by decreasing their priority.

When speaking about scheduling, processes are traditionally classified as

  1. I/O-bound or
  2. CPU-bound

The former make heavy use of I/O devices and spend much time waiting for I/O operations to complete; the latter are number-crunching applications that require a lot of CPU time.

An alternative classification distinguishes three classes of processes:

Interactive processes
These interact constantly with their users, and therefore spend a lot of time waiting for keypresses and mouse operations. When input is received, the process must be woken up quickly, or the user will find the system to be unresponsive. Typically, the average delay must fall between 50 and 150 ms. The variance of such delay must also be bounded, or the user will find the system to be erratic. Typical interactive programs are command shells, text editors, and graphical applications.
Batch processes
These do not need user interaction, and hence they often run in the background. Since such processes do not need to be very responsive, they are often penalized by the scheduler. Typical batch programs are programming language compilers, database search engines, and scientific computations.
Real-time processes
These have very strong scheduling requirements. Such processes should never be blocked by lower-priority processes, they should have a short response time and, most important, such response time should have a minimum variance. Typical real-time programs are video and sound applications, robot controllers, and programs that collect data from physical sensors.

The two classifications we just offered are somewhat independent. For instance, a batch process can be either I/O-bound (e.g., a database server) or CPU-bound (e.g., an image-rendering program). While in Linux real-time programs are explicitly recognized as such by the scheduling algorithm, there is no way to distinguish between interactive and batch programs. In order to offer a good response time to interactive applications, Linux (like all Unix kernels) implicitly favors I/O-bound processes over CPU-bound ones.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s