Reprint from Open vSwitch: We love the existing network stack in Linux. It is robust, flexible, and feature rich. Linux already contains an in-kernel L2 switch (the Linux bridge) which can be used by VMs for inter-VM communication. So, it is reasonable to ask why there is a need for a new network switch. The answer is that Open vSwitch is targeted at multi-server virtualization deployments, a landscape for which the existing stack is not well suited. These environments are often characterized by highly dynamic end-points, the maintenance of logical abstractions, and (sometimes) integration with or offloading to special purpose switching hardware. The following characteristics and design considerations help Open vSwitch cope with the above requirements. * The mobility of state: All network state associated with a network entity (say a virtual machine) should be easily identifiable and migratable between different hosts. This may include traditional "soft state" (such as an entry in an L2 learning table), L3 forwarding state, policy routing state, ACLs, QoS policy, monitoring configuration (e.g. NetFlow, sFlow), etc. Open vSwitch has support for both configuring and migrating both slow (configuration) and fast network state between instances. For example, if a VM migrates between end-hosts, it is possible to not only migrate associated configuration (SPAN rules, ACLs, QoS) but any live network state (including, for example, existing state which may be difficult to reconstruct). Further, Open vSwitch state is typed and backed by a real data-model allowing for the development of structured automation systems. * Responding to network dynamics: Virtual environments are often characterized by high-rates of change. VMs coming and going, VMs moving backwards and forwards in time, changes to the logical network environments, and so forth. Open vSwitch supports a number of features that allow a network control system to respond and adapt as the environment changes. This includes simple accounting and visibility support such as NetFlow and sFlow. But perhaps more useful, Open vSwitch supports a network state database (OVSDB) that supports remote triggers. Therefore, a piece of orchestration software can "watch" various aspects of the network and respond if/when they change. This is used heavily today, for example, to respond to and track VM migrations. Open vSwitch also supports OpenFlow as a method of exporting remote access to control traffic. There are a number of uses for this including global network discovery through inspection of discovery or link-state traffic (e.g. LLDP, CDP, OSPF, etc.). * Maintenance of logical tags: Distributed virtual switches (such as VMware vDS and Cisco's Nexus 1000V) often maintain logical context within the network through appending or manipulating tags in network packets. This can be used to uniquely identify a VM (in a manner resistant to hardware spoofing), or to hold some other context that is only relevant in the logical domain. Much of the problem of building a distributed virtual switch is to efficiently and correctly manage these tags. Open vSwitch includes multiple methods for specifying and maintaining tagging rules, all of which are accessible to a remote process for orchestration. Further, in many cases these tagging rules are stored in an optimized form so they don't have to be coupled with a heavyweight network device. This allows, for example, thousands of tagging or address remapping rules to be configured, changed, and migrated. In a similar vein, Open vSwitch supports a GRE implementation that can handle thousands of simultaneous GRE tunnels and supports remote configuration for tunnel creation, configuration, and tear-down. This, for example, can be used to connect private VM networks in different data centers. * Hardware integration: Open vSwitch's forwarding path (the in-kernel datapath) is designed to be amenable to "offloading" packet processing to hardware chipsets, whether housed in a classic hardware switch chassis or in an end-host NIC. This allows for the Open vSwitch control path to be able to both control a pure software implementation or a hardware switch. There are many ongoing efforts to port Open vSwitch to hardware chipsets. These include multiple merchant silicon chipsets (Broadcom and Marvell), as well as a number of vendor-specific platforms. The advantage of hardware integration is not only performance within virtualized environments. If physical switches also expose the Open vSwitch control abstractions, both bare-metal and virtualized hosting environments can be managed using the same mechanism for automated network control. In many ways, Open vSwitch targets a different point in the design space than the existing Linux networking stack, focusing on the need for automated and dynamic network control in large-scale Linux-based virtualization environments. The goal with Open vSwitch is to keep the in-kernel code as small as possible (as is necessary for performance) and to re-use existing subsystems when applicable (for example Open vSwitch uses the existing QoS stack). Open vSwitch limits disruption by using existing hooks into the kernel, so Open vSwitch can be deployed as a module without requiring any modification to the kernel.